Dispositivos de asistencia ventricular en el shock cardiogénico posinfarto: importancia del soporte hemodinámico: reporte de caso / Ventricular assist devices in post-infarction cardiogenic shock: importance of hemodynamic support: case report / Dispositivos de assistência ventricular no choque cardiogênico pós-infarto: importância do suporte hemodinâmico: relato de caso

El shock cardiogénico posinfarto caracterizado por un estado de insuficiencia circulatoria sistémica requiere de un tratamiento precoz en vistas a restablecer la estabilidad hemodinámica y la función ventricular. Este consta de la reperfusión coronaria mediante revascularización miocárdica; en algunos casos es necesaria la utilización de dispositivos de asistencia ventricular. El ECMO venoarterial es un sistema de circulación extracorpórea que permite un soporte biventricular oxigenando la sangre y reintroduciéndola mediante un flujo continuo hacia la circulación arterial sistémica. El uso de dicho dispositivo en pacientes con shock cardiogénico ha mostrado una mejoría significativa de la sobrevida a 30 días en comparación con el uso del balón de contrapulsación intraaórtico. No obstante, sus potenciales complicaciones, como dificultad en el vaciamiento ventricular izquierdo, síndrome de Arlequín, sangrados e infecciones, hacen fundamental la formación y el trabajo en equipo del heart team. Un porcentaje no menor de estos pacientes presentarán una severa disfunción ventricular permanente, por lo que podrían ser candidatos a dispositivos de asistencia ventricular izquierda de larga duración tipo Heartmate III como puente al trasplante cardíaco, el cual ha mostrado resultados satisfactorios con una excelente sobrevida a mediano plazo.

Post-infarction cardiogenic shock characterized by a state of systemic circulatory failure requires early treatment in order to restore hemodynamic stability and ventricular function. This consists of coronary reperfusion through myocardial revascularization, requiring in some cases the use of ventricular assist devices. Veno-arterial ECMO is an extracorporeal circulation system that allows biventricular support by oxygenating the blood and reintroducing it through a continuous flow towards the systemic arterial circulation. The use of this device in patients with cardiogenic shock has shown a significant improvement in survival at 30 days compared to the use of intra-aortic balloon pump. However, its potential complications, such as difficulty in left ventricular emptying, Harlequin syndrome, bleeding and infections, make the training and teamwork of the heart team essential. A great percentage of these patients will present a severe permanent ventricular dysfunction, so they could be candidates for long-term mechanical circulatory support devices like Heartmate III as a bridge to transplant or myocardial recovery, or destination therapy, which has shown satisfactory results with excellent medium-term survival.

O choque cardiogênico pós-infarto caracterizado por um estado de insuficiência circulatória sistêmica requer tratamento precoce para restabelecer a estabilidade hemodinâmica e a função ventricular. Esta consiste na reperfusão coronariana por meio de revascularização miocárdica, necessitando, em alguns casos, do uso de dispositivos de assistência ventricular. A ECMO venoarterial é um sistema de circulação extracorpórea que permite o suporte biventricular oxigenando o sangue e reintroduzindo-o através de um fluxo contínuo para a circulação arterial sistêmica. O uso desse dispositivo em pacientes com choque cardiogênico mostrou melhora significativa na sobrevida em 30 dias em relação ao uso de contrapulsação com balão intra-aórtico. No entanto, suas potenciais complicações, como dificuldade de esvaziamento ventricular esquerdo, síndrome de Harlequin, sangramentos e infecções, tornam imprescindível o treinamento e o trabalho em equipe do time do coração. Não uma pequena porcentagem desses pacientes apresentará uma condição ventricular permanente grave, podendo ser candidatos a dispositivos de assistência ventricular esquerda de longa duração do tipo Heartmate III como ponte para o transplante cardíaco, que tem demonstrado resultados satisfatórios com excelente sobrevida em médio prazo.

Shock cardiogénico en infarto agudo de miocardio y soporte circulatorio puente al trasplante / Ischemic cardiogenic shock and short-term mechanical circulatory support as bridge to Transplantation

Resumen El shock cardiogénico (SC) presenta una elevada mortalidad y puede requerir de terapéuticas avanzadas como la asistencia circulatoria mecánica (ACM) y el trasplante cardíaco (TC). Se analizaron en forma retrospectiva, en un único centro, aquellos pacientes que presentaron un infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM), SC y requirieron ACM puente al TC. Entre enero 1997 y junio 2020, 524 pacientes recibieron un TC, 203 por cardiopatía isquémica, 103 en lista de emergencia. Se incluyeron once pacientes con los criterios mencionados (edad media 53 ± 11 años; hombres 73%). Se realizaron 5 angioplastias primarias y 2 cirugías de revascularización miocárdica de urgencia. Cuatro pacientes presentaban anatomía coronaria no pasible de revascularización. Todos recibieron tratamiento inotrópico y vasopresor y requirieron soporte con balón de contrapulsación intra aórtico (BCIA). Dos requirieron el implante de bomba centrífuga univentricular izquierda (BioMedicus®, Medtronic) y 2 de oxigenador de membrana extracorpóreo veno-arterial (ECMO-VA) periférico (Maquet®, Getinge Group). La mediana entre IAM y TC fue 15 días (rango 7-21) y la edad de los donantes 28 ± 11 años. Todos presentaron un IAM extenso (monto necrótico 35 ± 5%) con signos histopatológicos de necrosis transmural e injuria de reperfusión. La mediana de seguimiento fue 9 años (rango 1-15). Ninguno falleció en la internación ni durante el primer año post trasplante. La supervivencia a los 5 y 10 años fue 73% y 55%. El TC en situación de emergencia ha demostrado ser, en nuestro medio, la mejor opción en aquellos pacientes con IAM y SC refractario a la terapia convencional.

Abstract Cardiogenic shock (CS) has a high mortality rate and often requires advanced therapies such as mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and heart transplantation (HT). Those patients who presented an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with CS and required support through MCS as bridge to HT were retrospectively analyzed in a single Center. Between January 1997 and June 2020, 524 patients received HT, 203 for ischemic-cardiomyopathy, 103 were in emergency waiting list. Eleven patients met the inclusion criteria (mean age 53 ± 11 years old; men 73%). Five primary angioplasties and 2 emergency myocardial revasculariza tion surgeries were performed. Four patients had coronary anatomy not subject to revascularization. All received inotropic and vasopressor treatment and required intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). Subsequently, two required support with a left univentricular centrifugal pump (BioMedicus®, Medtronic) and two with peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (VA-ECMO) (Maquet®, Getinge Group). The median between AMI and HT was 15 days (range 7-21) and the mean age of the donors 28 ± 11 years. All had extensive AMI (necrotic amount 35 ± 5%) with histopathological signs of transmural necrosis and reperfusion injury. The median follow-up was 9 years (range 1-15). None died in hospitalization or during the first year after transplantation. Survival at 5 and 10 years was 73% and 55%. Emergency HT may be the best option for selected patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock refractory to conventional therapy.

Use of CentriMag for refractory cardiogenic shock in a puerperal woman: case report

ABSTRACT CONTEXT: Heart failure in Brazil is a major public health problem and, even with advances in treatment, it still presents high morbidity and mortality. As a treatment option, mechanical circulatory assist devices (MCADs) have greatly increased in importance over the last decade. CASE REPORT: This report concerns a case of refractory cardiogenic shock due to acute myocarditis in a 35-year-old puerperal female patient who presented with retrosternal pain, fatigue and dyspnea. At the hospital, she was diagnosed with myocarditis. There was no improvement in perfusion even after receiving dobutamine, intra-aortic balloon passage (IAB) and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Therefore, it was decided to implant a MCAD (CentriMag). During hospitalization, recovery from the bi-ventricular dysfunction was achieved. The CentriMag device was removed 10 days after it had been implanted, and the patient was discharged after another 8 days. The myocarditis was proven to be due to the Coxsackie virus. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to implant a MCAD should be individualized, as patient profiles do not always match the indications in the guidelines and protocols. In this study, clinical discussion of the case among the medical and multi-professional teams was essential in order to be able to successfully reverse the patient's severe clinical condition without sequelae, through using a CentriMag implant.

Efficacy of combined treatment with mechanical circulation support devices and immunomodulation therapy for patients with fulminant myocarditis / 中华心血管病杂志

Objective: To summarize the efficacy of combined treatment strategy of mechanical circulation support devices and immunomodulation therapy for patients with fulminant myocarditis. Method: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and outcomes of 37 fulminant myocarditis patients complicating cardiogenic shock, who were hospitalized from October 2017 to December 2019 in our department. Patients received guideline therapy according to "Chinese expert consensus statement on clinical diagnosis and treatment of fulminant myocarditis in adults"issued by Chinese Society of Cardiology of Chinese Medical Association. Patients were divided into IABP group (n=19), ECMO group (n=5) and IABP+ECMO group (n=13) according to different mechanical circulation support regimen. The treatment effectiveness among various groups were compared. The major endpoint was in-hospital mortality. The duration and outcome of mechanical circulation support were also analyzed. Furthermore, relationships between baseline data, proportion of different treatments (including medicine treatment, temporary pacemaker and continuous renal replacement treatment, immunomodulation therapy) and clinical outcome were analyzed. Results: The age of the 37 patients in the cohort was (37.4±17.0) years, and there were 22 male among them. Immunomodulation therapy included glucocorticoid (methylprednisolone) and intravenous immunoglobin. At admission, blood pressure was (70.21±17.37)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa),heart rate was(100±30)beat/minutes,there were 10 cases of Ⅲ° atrioventricular block and all received temporary pacemaker implantation, 12 cases of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation,1 patient received temporary pacemaker implantation due to electronic storm, peak cardiac troponin I level was (18.61±9.55)μg/L, peak B type natriuretic peptide level was 1 670(518,3 410)ng/L,left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was(32.3±10.4)%. Thirty-four out of the 37 patients survived and 3 patients died. Hospital duration was (22.7±8.2)days, LVEF was (50.1±10.5)% at discharge. Lactic acid level was significantly higher in IABP+ECMO group than in IABP group and ECMO group(P<0.001 or =0.005),LVEF was significantly lower in IABP+ECMO group than in IABP group(P=0.004),the proportion of ventilator usage was higher in IABO+ECMO group than in IABP group (P<0.05). Survival rate was similar among the three groups. Conclusion: Comprehensive treatment regimen with combined mechanical circulation support and immunomodulation therapy as the core strategies is effective in the treatment of fulminant myocarditis complicated with cardiogenic shock.

Urgencias hematooncológicas: desde la perspectiva del intensivista / Hematology/oncology urgencies: from the perspective of the intensivist

Entre los años 2000 y 2016 en Argentina, se reportaron al Registro Oncopediátrico Hospitalario Argentino (ROHA) 22.450 casos de cáncer en niños menores de 15 años de edad. Las Leucemias constituyen la enfermedad oncológica más frecuente, seguida de los Tumores de Sistema Nervioso Central y los Linfomas. Esta distribución es similar a la descripta en los países desarrollados de Europa y Norteamérica. Su tasa de curación a nivel mundial, llega al 80% debido al uso de quimioterapia intensiva, situación que mejora la supervivencia pero que también aumenta la frecuencia de complicaciones. Estas complicaciones pueden ser debidas tanto al propio cáncer como al tratamiento y en ocasiones ser la primera manifestación de la enfermedad oncológica. Los eventos que amenazan la vida en pacientes inmunocomprometidos son mayores que en la población general, y cuando ocurren tienen una mortalidad elevada. El reconocimiento temprano es clave para el resultado en términos de sobrevida y disminución de la mortalidad. Las acciones deberán centrarse al reconocimiento temprano de eventos críticos en pacientes oncológicos. Los pacientes Hemato-Oncológicos constituyen un gran número de ingresos no planificados a las unidades de cuidados intensivos. Uno de cada 4 pacientes requerirá durante su evolución ingreso a Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos. El propósito de este artículo es describir tres de las urgencias oncológicas que requieren con mayor frecuencia admisión en UCI: la presentación y manejo del shock séptico, Shock Cardiogénico y las complicaciones neurológicas en los pacientes con leucemias agudas (AU)

Between 2000 and 2016, 22,450 cases of cancer in children younger than 15 years of age were reported to the Argentine Hospital Registry of Childhood Cancer (ROHA). Leukemia was the most common cancer reported, followed by central nervous system tumors and lymphoma. This distribution is similar to that described in the developed countries of Europe and North America. The worldwide cure rate is up to 80% due to the use of intensive chemotherapy, which improves survival but also increases the complication rate. These complications may be due both to the cancer itself and to the treatment and are sometimes the first manifestation of the disease. Life-threatening events are more common in immunocompromised patients than in the general population, and when they occur, the mortality rate is high. Early recognition is essential for the outcome in terms of survival and decreased mortality. Interventions should focus on early recognition of critical events in cancer patients. Patients with hematology-oncology diseases account for a large number of unplanned admissions to intensive care units (ICU), while one in four of these patients will require admission to the ICU in the course of their disease. The aim of this study was to describe three oncology emergencies that most frequently require ICU admission: septic shock and its management, cardiogenic shock, and neurological complications in patients with acute leukemia (AU)

Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for periprocedural Cardiogenic shock during interventional cardiology

ABSTRACT Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is uncommon in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) among patients undergoing coronary angiography. Periprocedural CS is more frequent in high-risk patients and in technically demanding procedures. Aim: To describe the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (pVA-ECMO) for CS associated with interventional cardiology procedures. Material and Methods: Review of clinical records of seven patients treated between January 2014 and October 2018. Results: pVA-ECMO was implanted within 6 hours of the interventional cardiology procedure. All patients had coronary artery disease and one of them also had symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. One patient entered the CCL in cardiac arrest. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed in all patients; four patients underwent an emergency procedure and five patients experienced PCI complications. One patient undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement suffered acute severe aortic regurgitation. An intra-aortic balloon pump was inserted at the CCL in five patients. Six patients experienced cardiac arrest. Mean SAVE score was -4.3 and baseline lactate 55 mg/dl. pVA-ECMO mean duration was 5 ± 4 days. Survival after both hospital discharge and 12 months of follow-up was 85.7% Regarding vascular access complications, we observed one access site hematoma and one episode of cannulation site bleeding requiring surgical repair. Conclusions: pVA-ECMO should be considered in patients with periprocedural CS as a bridge to recovery. Its use was associated with improved clinical outcomes in this series.

Antecedentes: El shock cardiogénico (SC) es infrecuente en el laboratorio de cateterismo cardíaco (LCC) entre pacientes que son sometidos a coronariografía. El SC peri-procedimiento es más frecuente en pacientes de alto riesgo y en procedimientos técnicamente complejos. Objetivos: Describir los resultados clínicos de pacientes que fueron conectados a oxigenación con membrana extracorpórea veno-arterial periférica (ECMO-VAp) por SC peri-procedimiento de cardiología intervencional. Material y Métodos: Revisión de fichas clínicas de siete pacientes tratados en nuestro centro desde enero de 2014 a octubre de 2018. Resultados: ECMO-VAp fue utilizado dentro de las primeras 6 horas del procedimiento. Todos los pacientes tenían enfermedad coronaria y uno de ellos tenía además estenosis aórtica severa. Un paciente ingresó al LCC en paro cardíaco. Una intervención coronaria percutánea (ICP) fue realizada en todos los pacientes; 4 se realizaron procedimientos de emergencia y 5 pacientes tuvieron complicaciones de la ICP. A un paciente se le realizó un reemplazo valvular aórtico percutáneo y desarrolló una insuficiencia valvular aórtica aguda severa. Se instaló un balón de contrapulsación en el LCC en 5 pacientes. Seis pacientes tuvieron un paro cardiorrespiratorio. El valor del score de SAVE fue de -4,3 y el lactato basal 55 mg/dL. La duración media del ECMO-VAp fue 5 ± 4 días. La sobrevida al alta y a los 12 meses fue 85,7%. Como complicaciones del sitio de acceso vascular se observaron 1 hematoma y un episodio de sangrado que requirió reparación quirúrgica. Conclusiones: ECMO-VAp debería ser considerado en pacientes con SC peri-procedimiento como un puente a recuperación; su utilización estuvo asociada con mejoría de resultados clínicos en esta serie.

ECMELLA: Uso combinado de dispositivos de asistencia ventricular izquierda en el manejo del shock cardiogénico postinfarto agudo al miocardio / Combined use of left ventricular assist devices in cardiogenic shock. Report of one case

We report a 55-year-old woman with a history of hypothyroidism and type 2 diabetes mellitus who consulted at the emergency room because of intermittent oppressive chest discomfort. At admission, electrocardiogram showed a complete atrioventricular block. A transthoracic echocardiogram disclosed severe left ventricular dysfunction. The patient developed cardiogenic shock that required the installation of the Impella system. An emergency coronary angiography showed an ostial occlusion of the anterior descending artery. Despite successful primary angioplasty, she persisted with refractory shock and progressive hypoxemia. A concomitant connection to the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation system (ECMO) was decided. The support of both devices allowed the stabilization of the patient and the improvement of perfusion parameters.

Hemodynamic profiles related to circulatory shock in cardiac care units / Perfiles hemodinámicos relacionados con el choque circulatorio en unidades de cuidados cardiacos

Abstract One-third of the population in intensive care units is in a state of circulatory shock, whose rapid recognition and mechanism differentiation are of great importance. The clinical context and physical examination are of great value, but in complex situations as in cardiac care units, it is mandatory the use of advanced hemodynamic monitorization devices, both to determine the main mechanism of shock, as to decide management and guide response to treatment, these devices include pulmonary flotation catheter as the gold standard, as well as more recent techniques including echocardiography and pulmonary ultrasound, among others. This article emphasizes the different shock mechanisms observed in the cardiac care units, with a proposal for approach and treatment.

Resumen Un tercio de la población de pacientes en unidades de cuidados intensivos se encuentran en choque circulatorio, el identificarlo y determinar su mecanismo de manera rápida y eficaz es de gran importancia. El contexto clínico y el examen físico son de gran utilidad, sin embargo existen situaciones de alta complejidad en las que se requiere del uso de las distintas modalidades de monitorización hemodinámica avanzada, tanto para determinar la causa, como para decidir el manejo y guiar respuesta al tratamiento, incluyendo el catéter de flotación pulmonar como gold standard, así como técnicas más recientes incluyendo ecocardiografía y ultrasonido pulmonar, entre otros. Este artículo enfatiza los distintos mecanismos de choque observados en las unidades de cuidados cardiacos, con propuesta de abordaje y tratamiento.

Membrana de circulación extracorpórea en shock obstructivo secundario a enfermedad linfoproliferativa / Oxygenation with extracorporeal membrane in obstructive shock secondary to lymphoproliferative disease

La membrana de oxigenación extracorpórea arteriovenosa se utiliza cuando ocurre falla hemodinámica y respiratoria refractaria al tratamiento convencional; brinda soporte hemodinamico transitorio, oxigenacion y remocion de CO2, y permite reposo pulmonar. Asimismo ofrece la posibilidad de realizar ventilación ultraprotectiva y evitar la generación de VILI (Ventilation-Induced Lung Injury). No ha sido demostrada su utilización como una terapia frecuente en los casos con insuficiencia hemodinámica secundaria a shock obstructivo por afectación mediastínica. Presentamos el caso de un paciente con shock obstructivo por una masa mediastínica de origen linfoproliferativo tratada con membrana de circulación arteriovenosa extracorpórea.

The arteriovenous extracorporeal membrane is used in patients with hemodynamic and respiratory failure, unresponsive to conventional treatment. It provides transitory hemodynamic support, oxygenation and removal of CO2, allowing pulmonary rest. Moreover it offers the possibility of ultraprotective ventilation and avoids generation of VILI (Ventilation-Induced Lung Injury). It is not frequently used in patients with hemodynamic failure secondary to obstructive shock due to mediastinal compromise. We present the case of a patient with obstructive shock, mediastinal mass of lymphoproliferative origin that was treated with extracorporeal arteriovenous circulation membrane.

Miocarditis fulminante en adultos por el virus de la influenza B: reporte de dos casos y revisión de la literatura / Fulminant myocarditis due to the influenza B virus in adults: Report of two cases and literature review

Resumen La miocarditis es una enfermedad inflamatoria del miocardio. Las infecciones virales son la causa más común, aunque también puede deberse a reacciones de hipersensibilidad y de etiología autoinmunitaria, entre otras. El espectro clínico de la enfermedad es variado y comprende desde un curso asintomático, seguido de dolor torácico, arritmias y falla cardiaca aguda, hasta un cuadro fulminante. El término 'fulminante' se refiere al desarrollo de un shock cardiogénico con necesidad de soporte vasopresor e inotrópico o dispositivos de asistencia circulatoria, ya sea oxigenación por membrana extracorpórea o balón de contrapulsación intraaórtico. Cerca del 10 % de los casos de falla cardiaca por miocarditis corresponde a miocarditis fulminante. La miocarditis por influenza se considera una condición infrecuente; no obstante, su incidencia ha aumentado desde el 2009 a raíz de la pandemia de influenza por el virus AH1N1. Por su parte, la miocarditis por influenza de tipo B sigue siendo una condición infrecuente. Se describen aquí dos casos confirmados de miocarditis fulminante por el virus de la influenza B atendidos en un centro cardiovascular, que requirieron dispositivos de asistencia circulatoria mecánica.

Abstract Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the myocardium. Viral infections are the most common cause, although it can also be due to hypersensitivity reactions and autoimmune etiology, among other causes. The clinical spectrum of the disease is varied, from an asymptomatic course, followed by chest pain, arrhythmias, and acute heart failure, to a fulminant episode. The term fulminant refers to the development of cardiogenic shock with a need for vasopressor support and inotropic or assisted circulation devices either extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or intra-aortic counterpulsation balloon. About 10% of cases of heart failure due to myocarditis correspond to fulminant myocarditis. Influenza myocarditis has been considered an infrequent condition. However, its incidence has increased since 2009 as a result of the AH1N1 pandemic; otherwise, myocarditis due to the Influenza type B virus remains an infrequent entity. We describe the experience in a cardiovascular center of two confirmed cases of fulminant myocarditis due to influenza B that required circulatory assistance devices.

ECMO en un lactante con shock cardiogénico secundario a endocarditis por Kingella Kingae / ECMO support in a child with cardiogenic shock due to Kingella Kingae endocarditis

Resumen: Introducción: La endocarditis es una enfermedad poco frecuente en niños, especialmente en los sin patología cardiaca previa, y de manera extraordinaria se identifica a Kingella Kingae (KK) como la causa. La oxigenación por membrana extracorpórea (ECMO) es una forma de soporte tanto para fa lla cardiaca como respiratoria. Objetivo: Reportar el primer caso de endocarditis infecciosa (EI) por KK que requiere soporte con ECMO por shock cardiogénico refractario. Caso clínico: Lactante de 19 meses, previamente sana, que consultó por cuadro de 2 días de fiebre, diagnosticándose síndrome pie mano boca. Evolucionó con shock, falla multiorgánica, síndrome de distress respiratorio agudo y compromiso hemodinámico profundo, por lo que se le dio soporte con ECMO veno arterial. La ecoscopía mostró imagen compatible con vegetación en válvula mitral, confirmando EI con ecocardiografía transtorácica. El hemocultivo fue positivo a KK. Presentó accidente cerebrovascular isquémico. Requirió dos cardiocirugías -la primera para resección de la masa y la segunda para la reparación de la válvula mitral, que había quedado con un pseudoaneurisma del anillo- velo posterior. La paciente tuvo una evolución favorable, siendo dada de alta a los 73 días desde el ingreso. Al año de seguimien to se encontraba asintomática cardiaca, pero persistía una hemiparesia braquiocrural derecha leve. Conclusión: Este es el primer caso reportado de EI por KK que requirió soporte vital extracorpóreo. La EI por KK es una patología infrecuente, que puede provocar falla orgánica múltiple, la que puede ser soportada exitosamente con ECMO.

Abstract: Introduction: Endocarditis is a rare disease in children, especially in those without previous heart disease, and Kingella Kingae (KK) is rarely identified as the cause. Extracorporeal membrane oxyge nation (ECMO) is a support for both heart and respiratory failure. Objective: To report the first case of infectious endocarditis (IE) due to KK which required ECMO support secondary to refractory cardiogenic shock. Clinical case: 19-months-old previously healthy female patient, with a 2-day his tory of fever, and diagnosed with hand-foot-and-mouth disease. The patient developed refractory cardiogenic shock, multiorgan failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and deep hemodynamic compromise that required veno-arterial ECMO support. The echography showed an image compa tible with mitral valve vegetation, confirming IE with transthoracic echocardiography. Blood culture was positive for KK. She had an ischemic stroke and required two heart surgeries, the first one for the mass resection and the second one for mitral valve repair, which had a posterior ring pseudoa neurysm. The patient had a favorable evolution and was discharged 73 days after admission. At one year of follow-up, she had no cardiological symptoms, but a mild right brachial-crural hemiparesis persisted. Conclusion: This is the first reported case of IE due to KK that required extracorporeal life support. KK endocarditis is an uncommon pathology that can cause multiorgan failure, which can be successfully supported with ECMO.

Uso de oxigenação por membrana extracorpórea para tratamento de miocardiopatia aguda após transplante hepático: relato de caso / Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for treating acute cardiomyopathy after liver transplantation: a case report

RESUMO Reportamos o caso de paciente do sexo feminino, 58 anos, sem doença cardíaca conhecida, submetida a transplante hepático sem intercorrências. No segundo dia do pós-operatório desenvolveu choque cardiogênico secundário à miocardiopatia induzida pelo estresse (síndrome de Takotsubo-like). A paciente foi manejada com sucesso com oxigenação por membrana extracorpórea venoarterial periférica, por 6 dias, com recuperação completa da função cardíaca, bem como do enxerto hepático. Síndrome coronariana e miocardite aguda foram excluídas como causas do choque. O uso de oxigenação por membrana extracorpórea neste cenário é possível e seguro, considerando protocolos e tratamento especializado neste tipo de suporte.

ABSTRACT We report the case of a female patient, 58 years of age, without known heart disease, who underwent liver transplantation without complications. On the second postoperative day, the patient developed cardiogenic shock secondary to stress-induced cardiomyopathy (Takotsubo-like syndrome). The patient was successfully managed with veno-arterial peripheral extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for 6 days, with complete recovery of cardiac function and of the hepatic graft. Coronary syndrome and acute myocarditis were excluded as the causes of the shock. The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in this scenario is possible and safe, considering its specialized protocols and treatment.

Cardiogenic shock with ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (ReNa-Shock ST)

Cardiogenic shock (CS) in the setting of an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a severe complication and constitutes one of the principal causes of death associated with this condition. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics, treatment strategies and hospital outcome of CS associated with STEMI in Argentina. The Argentine Registry of Cardiogenic Shock (ReNA-Shock) was a prospective and multicenter registry of consecutive patients with CS hospitalized in 64 centers in Argentina between July 2013 and May 2015. Only those with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were selected for this analysis. Of the 165 patients included in the ReNa-Shock registry, 124 presented STEMI. Median age was 64 years (IQR 25-75: 56.5-75) and 67% were men; median time from symptom onset to admission was 240 minutes (IQR 25-75: 132-720). 63% of the cases presented CS at admission. Eighty-seven percent underwent reperfusion therapy: 80% primary percutaneous intervention with a median door-to-balloon time of 110 minutes (IQR 25-75: 62-184). Inotropic agents were used in 96%; 79% required mechanical ventilation; a Swan Ganz catheter was inserted in 47% and 35% required intra-aortic balloon pumping. Most patients (59%) presented multivessel disease (MV). Hospital mortality was 54%. Multivariate analysis identified that time from symptom onset to admission (> 240 min) was the only independent predictor of mortality (OR: 3.04; CI 95%: 1.18-7.9). Despite using treatment strategies currently available, morbidity and mortality of STEMI complicated with CS remains high.

El shock cardiogénico (SC) en el síndrome coronario agudo con elevación del ST (SCACEST), es una complicación grave y constituye una de las principales causas de muerte. El objetivo del registro fue conocer las características clínicas, estrategias de tratamiento y evolución intrahospitalaria del SC secundario a un SCACEST en Argentina. El Registro Argentino de Shock Cardiogénico (ReNa-Shock) fue prospectivo, multicéntrico y consecutivo de pacientes internados con SC en el periodo 2013/2015 en 64 centros de Argentina. Fueron incluidos 165 pacientes, de los cuales124 presentaban SCACEST. La edad (mediana) fue de 64 [RIC25-75: 56-75] años, 67% hombres. La mediana de tiempo desde el inicio de los síntomas al ingreso hospitalario fue de 240 minutos [RIC25-75: 132-720]. Un 63% de los casos tuvo SC desde el ingreso. El 87% recibió tratamiento de reperfusión, con un 80% de angioplastia primaria y un tiempo puerta-balón (mediana): 110 minutos [RIC25-75: 62-184]. Requirieron inotrópicos un 96%, asistencia respiratoria mecánica el 79%, catéter de Swan Ganz 47%, balón de contrapulsación intraaórtico 35%. El 59% tenía lesión de 2 o 3 vasos. La mortalidad intrahospitalaria fue 54%. En el análisis multivariado, solo el tiempo de evolución al ingreso (345 min [RIC25-75: 135-720] vs. 180 min [RIC25-75: 85-420]; p: 0.03) fue la única variable predictora independiente de mortalidad. La morbimortalidad del SC complicando un SCACEST es elevada a pesar de la utilización de las estrategias de tratamiento actualmente disponibles.

Papel do suporte circulatório nas síndromes coronarianas aguda / The role of circulatory support in acute coronary syndromes

O tratamento da síndrome coronariana aguda obteve expressiva redução da mortalidade graças ao desenvolvimento de novos fármacos e da angioplastia coronariana primária. Entretanto, apesar desta terapêutica ser eficiente e oferecer resultados adequados no tratamento do infarto agudo do miocárdio (IAM), o choque cardiogênico ainda ocorre em 5 a 10% dos casos e continua a ser a principal causa de mortalidade intra-hospitalar. Portanto, temos um desfecho clínico insatisfatório neste grupo de pacientes com prognóstico reservado a curto e longo prazo. O balão intra-aórtico, embora empregado de forma rotineira no tratamento do choque cardiogênico refratário, apresenta benefícios limitados e não apresenta impacto no prognóstico destes pacientes, como demonstrado em ensaios randomizados recentes. Os sistemas de suporte de vida extracorpóreo (ECLS) são considerados dispositivos eficazes para o tratamento do choque cardiogênico refratário no IAM, uma vez que oferecem fluxo sanguíneo adequado e são instalados rapidamente pela canulação de vasos periféricos. Deste modo, permitem a tomada de decisões médicas para a realização de intervenções diagnósticas e terapêuticas – ponte para decisão – para tratamento da causa clínica e anatômica, com resultados clínicos consistentes e encorajadores para autilização deste tipo de tecnologia...

The treatment of acute coronary syndrome has achieved a significant reduction in mortality, thanks to the development of new drugs and primary coronary angioplasty. However, although this therapy is efficient and offers adequate results in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), cardiogenic shock still occurs in 5% to 10% of cases, and continues to be the main cause of intra hospital mortality. Therefore, we have an unsatisfactory clinical outcome in this group of patients, with a reserved prognosis in the short and long terms.The intra-aortic balloon pump, although used routinely in the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock, has limited benefits and does not have any impact on patient prognosis, as demonstrated in recent randomized trials. Extracorporeal life support systems (ECLS) are considered effective devices for the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock in AMI, as they offer adequate blood flow and are rapidly installed through cannulation of the peripheral veins. They therefore enable medical decision-making for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions – decision-making bridge – for treatment of the clinical and anatomical cause, with consistent and encouraging clinical results for the use of this type of technology...

Análise crítica do tratamento cirúrgico nas síndromes coronarianas agudas e suas complicaçõe / Critical analysis of surgical treatment in acute coronary syndromes and its complications

Apesar dos grandes avanços no tratamento médico, suporte farmacológico, técnicas de reperfusão e o suporte mecânico, as síndromes coronarianas ainda representam uma das principais causas de morbidade e mortalidade. Abordagens agressivas de revascularização miocárdica parecem estar associadas à redução da mortalidade em pacientes com síndromes coronarianas agudas (SCA). O melhor momento da intervenção não deve apenas reduzir a mortalidade em curto prazo, mas também oferecer resultados satisfatórios em longo prazo. Dependendo do tipo de evento, a síndrome coronariana aguda tem uma adequada modalidade terapêutica. Iremos abordar estratégias relacionadas ao infarto sem e com supra desnivelamento do segmento ST, infarto miocárdico com choque cardiogênico e as complicações mecânicas do infarto. De forma geral, a abordagem invasiva tem melhores resultados. Pacientes com infarto na fase aguda são abordados preferencialmente por técnicas percutâneas, pois a estratégia cirúrgica demanda tempo para a efetiva revascularização. Os resultados de seguimento em longo prazo variam de acordo com a extensão do infarto, a fração de ejeção e a anatomia coronariana. Aqueles pacientes que evoluem com choque cardiogênico têm alta mortalidade independente da estratégia utilizada. Pacientes que evoluem com complicações mecânicas, são necessariamente cirúrgicos, sendo que o melhor momento para a intervenção varia de acordo com a condição clínica e hemodinâmica...

Despite the great advances in medical treatment, pharmacological support, reperfusion techniques, and mechanical support, coronary syndromes are still among the main causes of morbidity and mortality. Aggressive myocardial revascularization approaches appear to be associated with reduced mortality in patients with ACS. The optimum moment of intervention should not only reduce mortality in the short term, but should also offer satisfactory results in the long term. Depending on the type of event, acute coronary syndrome has an adequate therapeutic modality. We address strategies related to infarction with and without ST segment elevation, myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock, and mechanical complications of infarction. Ingeneral, the invasive approach has shown best results. Patients with infarction in the acute phase are preferably treated by percutaneous techniques, as the surgical approach requires time for effective revascularization. The long-term results vary, depending on the extent of the infarction, the ejection fraction, and the coronary anatomy. Patients who evolve with cardiogenic shock have high mortality, regardless of the strategy used. Patients who evolve with mechanical complications must undergo surgery, with the best moment for the intervention depending on the clinical and hemodynamic condition...

Indicações de dispositivos mecânicos de suporte na insuficiência cardíaca refratár / Indications of mechanical support devices in refractory heart failur

A insuficiência cardíaca refratária e o choque cardiogênico estão relacionados aelevadas taxas de mortalidade e a baixa qualidade de vida. As estratégias de tratamento para esses pacientes foram limitadas, nos últimos anos, às terapias farmacológicas que pouco modificaram a evolução da doença. Entretanto, com o desenvolvimento tecnológico em dispositivos mecânicos de suporte circulatório, diversas modalidades terapêuticas utilizando diferentes tipos de tecnologia proporcionam melhor suporte hemodinâmico, diminuição e reversão de disfunções orgânicas causadas pela insuficiência cardíaca.Esses dispositivos quando indicados corretamente melhoram os desfechos clínicos de pacientes que aguardam transplante cardíaco e dos que não são candidatos a transplante. Atualmente, observam-se indicações cada vez mais precoces de dispositivos de suporte circulatório, tornando-os uma terapia essencial no manejo de pacientes cominsuficiência cardíaca refratária ou choque cardiogênico. Esta revisão abordará os principais tipos de dispositivos disponíveis em nosso país e suas indicações...

The refractory heart failure and cardiogenic shock are related to high rates of mortality and poor quality of life. Treatment strategies for these patients have been limited in the last yearsto pharmacological therapies that change only slightly the evolution of the disease. However, with technological advances in mechanical devices for circulatory assistance, various therapeutic modalities using different types of technology provide better hemodynamic support, reduction and reversal of organic dysfunction caused by heart failure. When properly indicated,these devices can provide better clinical outcomes of patients on heart transplantation waiting list and those who are not candidates for transplantation. Contemporarily, indications for mechanical support devices are occurring increasingly earlier, making them an essential therapy in the management of patients with refractory heart failure or cardiogenic shock.This review covers the different types of devices available in our country and its indications...